Skip to main content
StreamVetree
Sign in
CardiologyCase series / Retrospective2 min read · distilled by Vetree AI

EXPRESS: Comparison of Thames Medical CAT+ Doppler and AutoCAT+ Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor devices for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in cats.

Marriott E · Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery · 5 February 2026

Clinical bottom line

AutoCAT+ shows good agreement with Doppler ultrasound for feline blood pressure measurement in normotensive cats.

Summary

This comparative study evaluated the Thames Medical AutoCAT+ oscillometric device against the established Doppler method for non-invasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement in cats. Researchers collected 131 paired measurements from 26 cats in a shelter setting, including 6 anaesthetised cats undergoing elective procedures and 20 conscious cats during routine health assessment. Mean SBP values were similar between methods (113.3 ± 23.9 mmHg for Doppler versus 116 ± 26.7 mmHg for oscillometric), with no significant difference. Anaesthetised cats demonstrated significantly lower SBP than conscious animals. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small positive bias of the oscillometric method (3.07-4.93 mmHg across subgroups) with acceptable limits of agreement. Notably, both methods achieved 100% agreement in hypertension classification. The AutoCAT+ showed promising agreement with the Doppler standard in normotensive cats, though the authors acknowledge that validation within a broader blood pressure range, including hypotensive and hypertensive states, remains necessary for complete instrument qualification.

CardiologySmall AnimalInternal MedicineAnesthesia

This summary was distilled by AI and may occasionally misinterpret data. Confirm critical details with the primary literature before clinical application.