Skip to main content
StreamVetree
Sign in
OncologyCohort / Prospective2 min read · distilled by Vetree AI

Recurrent pyuria is associated with shorter progression-free survival in dogs with bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Choi SH, Kim JK, Kim SH, Ryu MO, Seo KW · American Journal of Veterinary Research · 1 June 2026

Clinical bottom line

Recurrent pyuria (≥3 episodes) is an independent negative prognostic factor for progression-free survival in dogs with bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Summary

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the prognostic significance of pyuria in 51 dogs diagnosed with bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) between 2010 and 2025. Pyuria was defined as ≥5 white blood cells per high-power field on urine sediment examination. Dogs were stratified by pyuria frequency (0, 1–2, or ≥3 episodes) and tumor size (<3 cm or ≥3 cm). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Dogs experiencing ≥3 pyuria episodes demonstrated significantly shorter median PFS compared to the nonpyuria group (175 vs. 365 days). This association persisted in multivariable analysis after controlling for total number of urinalyses performed, with ≥3 pyuria episodes identified as an independent negative prognostic factor (HR 3.57; 95% CI, 1.27–10.04). Dogs exhibiting pyuria at initial diagnosis also had shorter median OS than those without pyuria (353 vs. 531 days). Dogs with both initial pyuria and frequent recurrent pyuria (≥3 episodes) during treatment showed the poorest PFS outcomes. The 1–2 episode group did not differ significantly from the nonpyuria cohort. These findings parallel observations in human urothelial carcinoma literature and suggest that recurrent pyuria may serve as a readily accessible, non-invasive marker of disease progression in canine UC, potentially guiding monitoring frequency and treatment decisions in clinical practice.

OncologyInternal MedicineSmall AnimalPathology

This summary was distilled by AI and may occasionally misinterpret data. Confirm critical details with the primary literature before clinical application.