Skip to main content
StreamVetree
Sign in
OrthopedicsRCT / Meta-analysis2 min read · distilled by Vetree AI

Intravenous paracetamol does not have significant opioid-sparing effects when used as part of a multimodal analgesic protocol in dogs undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery.

Stallard R, Deutsch J, Murrell J · The Veterinary record · 13 March 2026

Clinical bottom line

IV paracetamol provided no significant opioid-sparing effect in perioperative canine orthopedic surgery.

Summary

This randomized controlled trial investigated whether intravenous paracetamol provides opioid-sparing effects when combined with NSAIDs in dogs undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. Twenty-seven dogs were divided into two groups: one receiving 10 mg/kg IV paracetamol after anesthetic induction and every 8 hours during hospitalization (n=14), and a control group receiving no paracetamol (n=13). All dogs received meloxicam or robenacoxib at licensed doses. Rescue analgesia with 0.1 mg/kg IV methadone was administered when Glasgow composite measure pain scale-short form scores exceeded 4/20. The study found no statistically significant differences in methadone requirements between groups (median 0.0 vs 0.1 mg/kg, p=0.17), either intraoperatively or postoperatively. Four test dogs and seven control dogs required rescue analgesia. The authors conclude that paracetamol did not provide clinically significant opioid-sparing effects when used as part of a multimodal analgesic protocol with NSAIDs in this perioperative setting. The low rescue analgesic requirements in both groups suggest potential type II statistical error may have influenced results.

OrthopedicsAnesthesiaPharmacologySmall Animal

This summary was distilled by AI and may occasionally misinterpret data. Confirm critical details with the primary literature before clinical application.