Skip to main content
StreamVetree
Sign in
AnesthesiaCase series / Retrospective2 min read · distilled by Vetree AI

Survey on veterinary anaesthesia practices for computed tomography in small animal referral hospitals in the UK.

Marchionne G, Heyes M, Grint N · Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia · 27 April 2026

Clinical bottom line

UK veterinary CT anaesthesia practices lack standardization; evidence-based guidelines needed urgently.

Summary

This survey examined anaesthesia practices for computed tomography (CT) scanning across 93 UK small animal referral veterinarians (49.2% response rate from 189 eligible practitioners). The study revealed significant variability in anaesthetic approaches and perioperative management. Notably, 65% of respondents lacked standard operating procedures (SOPs) for selecting general anaesthesia versus sedation, 71% lacked pre-contrast blood testing protocols, and 42% had no IVFT guidelines. Among those routinely using general anaesthesia, primary justifications included requirements for apnoea (51.6%), chest inflation requests (38.7%), and safety considerations during potential anaphylaxis (10.7%). Regarding contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) prevention, creatinine and urea were commonly measured (52.7%). Intravenous fluid therapy initiation and dosing strategies varied considerably, with 34.4% citing CI-AKI concerns as the primary indication for fluid administration. These findings highlight substantial inconsistency in evidence-based practice standardization across UK referral centres, despite recognized CI-AKI risks. The authors conclude that more rigorous research and consensus guidelines are essential to establish best-practice protocols for CT anaesthesia in veterinary medicine.

AnesthesiaRadiologySmall Animal

This summary was distilled by AI and may occasionally misinterpret data. Confirm critical details with the primary literature before clinical application.