Skip to main content
StreamVetree
Sign in
OphthalmologyCase series / Retrospective2 min read · distilled by Vetree AI

Efficacy of Therapeutic UVC Irradiation in Reducing Bacterial Load in Microbial Keratitis: A Retrospective Clinical Study in Veterinary Patients.

Dixon CJ, Lewin GA · Veterinary Ophthalmology · 1 September 2026

Clinical bottom line

A single low-dose UVC exposure reduced corneal bacterial load by over 96% in veterinary microbial keratitis cases.

Summary

This retrospective clinical study evaluated the immediate antimicrobial efficacy of a single low-dose therapeutic ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation on corneal bacterial load in veterinary patients diagnosed with microbial keratitis (MK). Thirty-four eyes from 30 client-owned patients (25 dogs, 6 horses, 3 cats) were treated at a UK referral ophthalmology clinic in 2025. Each eye received one 5-second UVC exposure at 265 nm (fluence 17.5 mJ/cm²) using a commercially available device (PhotonUVC). Paired corneal swabs collected immediately before and after treatment were cultured for colony-forming unit (CFU) quantification. Results demonstrated a median CFU reduction from 89.5 pre-treatment to 15.0 post-treatment, representing a median percent reduction of 96.5% (mean 92.3 ± 9.6%). Notably, 32 of 34 eyes (94%) achieved at least 75% bacterial reduction, and 11 eyes (32%) became culture-negative following a single exposure. Efficacy was observed across a broad spectrum of clinically relevant pathogens including Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, and coliforms, spanning all three species groups. While this study demonstrates a compelling immediate bactericidal effect, its retrospective, uncontrolled design and small sample size limit definitive conclusions. No long-term outcomes or adverse effects were reported. The authors recommend prospective controlled trials to clarify UVC's role as an adjunct to conventional antimicrobial therapy in veterinary ophthalmology practice.

OphthalmologySmall AnimalEquineLarge Animal

This summary was distilled by AI and may occasionally misinterpret data. Confirm critical details with the primary literature before clinical application.